Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Why We Don't Leave


Simon Peter answered, “Master, if we leave
You to whom shall we go? “ (Jn. 6:68)
Why We Don’t Leave
August 26, 2012, 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time
Joshua 24:1-2, 15-18   Ephesians 5:21-23   
John 6:51-53; 60-61; 66-69
Joshua gathered together all the tribes of Israel at Shechem, summoning their elders, their leaders, their judges, and their officers. When they stood in ranks before God, Joshua addressed all the people: “If it does not please you to serve the LORD, decide today whom you will serve, the gods your fathers served beyond the River or the gods of the Amorites in whose country you are now dwelling. As for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.” But the people answered, “Far be it from us to leave the LORD for the service of other gods. For it was the LORD, our God, who brought us and our fathers up out of the land of Egypt, out of a state of slavery. He performed those great miracles before our very eyes and protected us along our entire journey and among the peoples through whom we passed. Therefore we also will serve the LORD, for he is our God.” (Joshua 24:1-2, 15-18)  
The word of the Lord
Thanks be to God

Alleluia, alleluia.
A reading from the holy Gospel according to John  
Glory to you, Lord.

 
Jesus said to the crowds: “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats this bread he will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.”At this the crowds began to argue fiercely among themselves, “How can He give us his flesh to eat?” Jesus said to them: “I tell you the truth:  if you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood you will not have life in yourselves.”

After hearing his words many of Jesus’ disciples remarked among themselves, “This sort of talk is hard to take. How can anyone take it seriously?” Jesus well aware of the disciples’ grumbling asked them, “Does this scandalize you?”

From that time on, many of his followers left Jesus and returned to their former way of life. Jesus then said to the Twelve, “Do you also want to leave?” Simon Peter answered, “Master, if we leave You to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe and are convinced that You are the Holy One from God.”

The Gospel of the Lord.
Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ.
----------------
Introduction
Like autumn leaves
Here we are at the end of August; this coming Saturday will be the 1st of September. Autumn 2012 begins on the 22nd of September. The pages are falling off the calendar like autumn leaves.

No better place to go
My dog Simeon was a typical canine; when he heard the car keys clanging, he would be up and at it, and ready to go. I always had to take him with me, because it was so much easier than having to get down on my knees and try to explain to his sad drooping face why he couldn’t come along. He simply wouldn’t understand. So when I’d go grocery shopping on a hot summer day, I always had to take him with me, then find a shady spot to park the car, and leave the car windows wide-open. One day a lady passing asked, “Aren’t you afraid your dog is going to jump out of the window and run away?” The words of Simon Peter in today’s gospel to Jesus (Jn. 6: 68) came to mind, and I said to her, “If my dog leaves me, to whom shall he go?” My dog Simeon, you see, knew he had it made; he knew he had no better place to go. For I always prepared three square meals a day for him, even though he never lifted a finger to help me cut the lawn in the summer, or shovel the snow in the winter.

Many of Jesus’ followers left Him.
Jesus makes the incredible claim that He is bread from heaven and that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood will live forever. That stirs unbelief among the crowds, and they start grumbling. Hearing their grumbling Jesus asks, “Does this scandalize you?” (It’s a literal translation of the Greek `scandalidsei.’) The common understanding of `scandal’ is `that which makes us raise our eyebrows.’ The scriptural understanding of `scandal’ is different: it’s not about what causes us to raise our eyebrows but about what causes us to stumble, or what shakes our faith. Jesus’ incredible claim that He is bread from heaven and that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood will live forever shakes the crowd’s faith; it causes them to stumble. Scripture says, “From that time on, many of Jesus’ followers left Him and returned to their former way of life.” (Jn. 6:66)

Sr. Joan chooses not to leave the Church.
Sister Joan Chittister OSB, an internationally known theologian, sees her Church as a scandal - a stumbling block. She says, “It   is riddled with inconsistencies, closed to discussion about those inconsistencies, and is sympathetic only to invisible women.” Sr. Joan, however, chooses not to leave the Church but to stay right where she is. One day a woman asked her out-rightly: “Why doesn’t such an unhappy woman like you choose to leave the Church?” In response she used the imagery of an oyster. The oyster defends itself against the irritation of a grain of sand within itself by secreting layer upon layer of gel over the grain, until it becomes `a pearl of great price.’ (Mt. 13: 44-45)  Sr. Joan says if she would rid herself of the irritation by leaving the Church, the process would be over, and at the end of the day there would be no pearl of great price, neither in her nor in her Church. By staying and speaking out, she says we perform a needed `ministry of irritation,’ like the grain of sand that irritates the oyster, but in the process becomes a pearl of great price.

Fr. Küng chooses not to leave the Church.
Swiss-German theologian Fr. Hans Küng (b. 1928) also sees his Church as a scandal - a stumbling block - for a litany of theological reasons. In a little volume entitled Why I am still a Christian, he writes that he cannot believe

1. that Jesus who warned the Pharisees against laying intolerable burdens on people’s shoulders would today declare all artificial contraception to be mortal sin;

2. that He who particularly invited failures to his table would forbid all remarried divorced people to approach the Eucharistic table;

3. that He who was constantly accompanied by women (who provided for his keep), and whose apostles, except for Paul, were all married and remained so, would today forbid marriage to all ordained men, or ordination to all women;

4. that Jesus who said “I have compassion on the crowd,” would have increasingly deprived  congregations of their pastors and allowed a system of pastoral care built up over a period of a thousand years to collapse;

5. that He who defended the adulteress and sinners would pass such harsh verdicts in delicate questions requiring discriminating and critical judgment, like pre-marital sex, homosexuality and abortion.


In that same little volume Fr. Küng tells why he chooses not to leave the Church, despite his long litany of complaints.

First of all, despite all my criticisms and concerns, I can nevertheless feel fundamentally positive about a tradition in which I live side by side with so many others, past and present. I would not dream of confusing the great Christian tradition with the present structures of the church, nor [would I dream of] leaving the definition of true Christian values to its present administrators.  In that great Christian tradition, I find a spiritual home on which I do not want to turn my back.[1]

 
Andrea chooses to return to the Church she left.
Andrea Palpant Dilley grew up in Kenya, the daughter of Quaker missionaries. She is a summa cum laude graduate, and the author of Faith and Other Flat Tires - a memoir about faith, doubt, and the search for truth. One Sunday Andrea’s Presbyterian pastor was preaching on Psalm 91, and in so many words said that a person just needed to pray and have faith in order to be protected from suffering. At that, Andrea suddenly found herself standing up, leaning over to her father and saying, “This is BS!” With that, she made her way to the end of the pew and marched out of the church, and left the Church. She was 23 at the time. It wasn’t just that sermon which ticked her off; many spiritual questions were also plaguing her: Why does the Church seem so culturally insulated and dysfunctional? Why does God seem so distant and uninvolved? And most of all, why does God allow suffering?

Those questions didn’t come from nowhere. In high school she had spent time volunteering in refugee camps in Kenya. In college she worked with families on welfare in central Washington. She saw hungry babies. She walked into homes that were piled with garbage and dirty laundry. In an orphanage in the slums of Nairobi, she held AIDS babies and worked with disabled kids who had been left at the front gate of an orphanage by parents who couldn’t afford to feed them. She saw things that didn’t make sense to a Christian. Walking out of church that day and leaving the Church was her way of saying “To hell with it all! I’m done!” For two years, she skipped church. Her Bible gathered dust on the shelf. The local bars became her temples. She indulged in the cliché rebellions of a Christian girl: smoking cigarettes and drinking hard alcohol. She got involved with men twice her age without thinking twice about it.  She wanted a break from being `good.’

And then, strangely, she woke up one morning at age 25, climbed into her car, and drove downtown to attend a 10 a.m. church service. She had decided to return to the Church! Simon Peter said to Jesus, “Master, if we leave You, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. At the end of the day Andrea like Simon Peter discovered that she had no better place to go. So she returned to the Church, because (despite all its faults) she saw the Church “as a place to ask unanswerable questions, and a place to search for God.”

Conclusion
No better place to go
Despite the clergy sex abuse, despite the refusal of the Church to deal meaningfully with the shortage of priests; despite her macho approach to the ordination of women, despite the Church’s pretense that gays do not exist or that the faithful don’t practice birth control--despite all that, we choose not to leave the Church. We choose to stay and, like Sr. Joan, engage in `a ministry of irritation’ which turns a grain of sand into a pearl of great price. We choose to stay in the Church, because like Fr. Küng we find in the Church “a spiritual home” on which we, like him, don’t want to turn our backs. Or we choose to return to the Church, as Andrea did, when she finally came to realize that the Church indeed is the place to “ask unanswerable questions, and the place to search for God.” Despite everything, we choose to stay in the Church with Sr. Chittister and Fr. Küng, or we choose to return with Andrea, because, like my dog Simeon who wouldn’t jump out of the open windows of my car on a hot summer day, we’ve come to realize we have no better place to go.


[1] Why I am still a Christian was written back in 1986 when John Paul II was pope.